bloomberg-live Transcript

628 segs ← CIO Feed

Full Transcript

Showing latest 50 of 628 segments. Ads filtered. Auto-refreshes 90 s.
17:54
PDT
Bank of Korea raises GDP growth forecast to 2.6%.
Bank of KoreaSouth KoreaSK HynixHanwha OceanGDPAI
– AI cycle expected to boost exports and consumption.
– Government spending is supporting lower-income households.
– K-shaped recovery concerns persist with high household debt.
– Supplementary budget indicates proactive government measures.
AI impact on economyGovernment spendingK-shaped recoveryGDP growth forecast
▸ Full transcript
Though we are expecting Korea's growth to be around 2.6 percent, we are considering raising our forecast for GDP. The market and Bank of Korea also hinted that they are going to raise their GDP forecast. So indeed, there is growth potential for not only exports but also consumption and government spending driven by this AI cycle. Does that also help offset some of the concerns around the deepening of the K-shaped recovery, with household debt still being high? Of course, we're seeing apartment prices in Korea, for example, that not everybody can afford. Does the AI cycle and the boom help mitigate some of the fallout from the inequality that we're also seeing in that country? Yes, it will definitely help. Though it's more driven and focused in the tech sector, we are seeing that government spending is helping to support the lower part of the K. For example, in April this year, the Korean government did a supplementary budget to support the general public. So indeed, the impact of the AI cycle is not only impacting a specific industry but also supporting general private consumption and government spending.
Analysis

The Bank of Korea has raised its GDP growth forecast to around 2.6%, driven by the AI cycle, which is expected to bolster both exports and consumption. This growth potential may help mitigate the ongoing K-shaped recovery and high household debt issues in South Korea.

The AI boom is not just a tech sector phenomenon; it is also influencing government spending and private consumption. The recent supplementary budget by the Korean government indicates a strategic effort to support lower-income households, suggesting that AI's impact could extend beyond traditional economic boundaries.

17:51
PDT
Bank of Korea raises interest rate to 2.75%.
Bank of KoreaSK HynixHanwha OceanKorean wonKospiSKBOKAISouth KoreanPRIVATEDXY
– Foreign investors are net selling in the Kospi.
– Korean exporters are stabilizing the dollar-Korean won exchange rate.
– AI sector growth may mitigate tightening effects.
– Inflation is accelerating at the fastest pace in over two years.
monetary policyinflationAI sector growthforeign investment
▸ Full transcript
This decline is that first, foreign investors have been net selling in the Kospi. However, they've been moderating their net selling with the Kospi correcting. And secondly, Korean exporters such as SK Hynix and Hanwha Ocean are selling dollars. So this has been helping the dollar-Korean won stabilize down. We continue to see this exuberance around anything to do with artificial intelligence. How much will this actually help when it comes to the South Korean economy? Hold on to your thought right now because we are getting the Bank of Korea coming out with its policy decision. It's a hike to 2.75 percent from 2.5 percent as expected by all economists surveyed by Bloomberg. We'll be talking right now with Yeonjin about the implications for the South Korean economy given that we have inflation now accelerating at the fastest pace in more than two years. Of course, Yeonjin, give us your reaction to the very much anticipated rate hike that we're getting from the BOK. But as I was talking about the semiconductor boom, how much will the AI trade really help offset some of this tightening that we're seeing from the BOK as well? Sure. So this rate hike in July was widely expected given the signal from the BOK. So the focus today with the press conference will be more on the BOK.
Analysis

The Bank of Korea has raised its policy rate to 2.75% from 2.5%, aligning with economists' expectations amid accelerating inflation. This rate hike comes as foreign investors have been net selling in the Kospi, while Korean exporters are stabilizing the dollar-Korean won exchange rate by selling dollars.

The semiconductor sector, particularly driven by AI advancements, may provide some offset to the tightening monetary policy. However, the real impact on the South Korean economy will depend on how effectively these AI-driven gains can counterbalance the pressures from rising interest rates and inflation.

17:49
PDT
China identifies exchange rate volatility as an inflation risk.
ChinaKorean wonBank of KoreaBOKUSDCNH
– The Korean won is affected by stock market fluctuations.
– The Bank of Korea is considering measures to tame market volatility.
– Government intervention may signal a strategy to stabilize the economy.
– Increased focus on leverage and single stock products indicates heightened risk.
exchange rate volatilityinflation riskmonetary policy
▸ Full transcript
China has also highlighted the exchange rate volatility as an inflation risk. Given that we're seeing the volatility in the stock markets also affecting what's happening with the Korean won, how do you expect that to apply and really affect monetary policy when it comes to the market fluctuations? So what about the fact that we're seeing more volatility in the equity space as well? There's leverage, single stock products. We know that the government is now trying to see if there are some measures to really tame this volatility. The 24-hour won trading situation as well. When it comes to financial conditions in the country, is this something that the BOK considers?
Analysis

China has flagged exchange rate volatility as an inflation risk, which is impacting the Korean won and could influence monetary policy. The Bank of Korea is considering measures to address this volatility amid fluctuating financial conditions in the country.

Smart money should note that the government's intervention in the equity markets may signal a broader strategy to stabilize the economy, potentially affecting investor sentiment and market dynamics. The focus on single stock products and leverage indicates a heightened risk environment that could lead to increased regulatory scrutiny.

17:43
PDT
Emerging U.S. open model ecosystem in AI.
Shyam SankarBloombergU.S.Nemotronfrontier labsneolabsTyler KendallAINew YorkYoroshayam ShankarPRIVATE
– Upcoming announcements from non-frontier labs expected.
– Government equity stakes in critical companies could vary in effectiveness.
– Potential for increased competition in AI may drive innovation.
– Capital injections from the government could influence tech market dynamics.
AI competitiongovernment equity strategynational security
▸ Full transcript
To propose a moratorium in New York on data centers. Turning our back on AI would be as consequential a mistake as turning our back on the atom in the 70s. We're starting to see a burgeoning, it's just the beginning, but a burgeoning U.S. open model ecosystem forming. In videos, Nemotron models are very good. I think you're going to see in the next month a slate of announcements of other American companies, non-frontier labs, sometimes called neolabs, who are putting out open weight models that companies are going to be able to cheaply fine-tune and capture their own alpha in weights they control. In the final minute that I have you, part of the U.S.'s strategy when it comes to national security has been to have the government take equity stakes in companies that are deemed critical to national security. We know the idea has been floated when it comes to some of these frontier labs. I'm wondering what you make of this strategy. Is this the right way for the U.S. to go about it? So I think it's very case dependent. I'm glad it's an option on the table. I think for some companies where they need a huge equity injection, it could make a lot of sense. For other companies, based on where they are in the mix of business they do between the commercial and government world, I'm not sure it makes as much sense. But I'm glad it's an option that's on the table. It should be a consideration. Volunteer city, Yoroshayam Shankar, they're speaking with Bloomberg's Tyler Kendall. More ahead here on the Azure trade, this is Bloomberg.
Analysis

The U.S. is witnessing the emergence of an open model ecosystem in AI, with upcoming announcements from American companies expected to enhance competition. The government's strategy of taking equity stakes in critical national security companies is seen as a viable option, though its effectiveness may vary by case.

Investors should note the potential for increased competition in the AI space, which could lead to more innovative solutions and cost-effective models. Additionally, the government's equity strategy may provide necessary capital for companies at critical junctures, influencing market dynamics in the tech sector.

17:41
PDT
CXMT's IPO could disrupt the DRAM market dominated by Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron.
CXMTPalantirShyam SankarBloombergU.S.ChinaIPOAIPennsylvania DefenseInnovation SummitPRIVATE
– Palantir's CTO warns of economic risks from Chinese AI advancements.
– Concerns over improper use of AI techniques by Chinese rivals are growing.
– The U.S. may need to reassess its approach to national security in relation to economic competitiveness.
– Investor sentiment towards CXMT's IPO will be critical in shaping market dynamics.
chip market disruptionU.S.-China tech competition
▸ Full transcript
Now, the CXMT will start taking investor orders today. So what does this all mean in terms of reception for this IPO? The chief technology officer, Palantir, sees Chinese AI models posing an economic risk to the U.S. This has concerns among top American AI companies' growth over Chinese rivals, improperly using a technique known as distillation. Shyam Sankar spoke to Bloomberg at the 2026 Pennsylvania Defense and Innovation Summit. My view is that national security is not an end unto itself. It's a means to an end. The actual end is American prosperity.
Analysis

CXMT is set to begin taking investor orders for its IPO, raising concerns about the competitive landscape in the chip market. The CTO of Palantir highlighted the economic risks posed by Chinese AI models to U.S. companies, emphasizing that national security is a means to ensure American prosperity.

17:39
PDT
Apple's deal reinforces the significance of regulatory trust in China's tech landscape.
AppleHuaweiXiaomiAlibabaCXMTSamsungSK HynixMicronJulie RennCatherine LimAISKAAPLUSDCNHPRIVATE
– CXMT is rapidly increasing its market share in the DRAM sector.
– CXMT's upcoming IPO could raise $10 billion, indicating strong investor interest.
– Alibaba's recognition as a partner for global AI could enhance its market position.
– The competitive landscape in the chip market is shifting with emerging players like CXMT.
regulatory trustsemiconductor competitionIPO market dynamics
▸ Full transcript
The Apple deal doesn't quite knock off Huawei or Xiaomi from the smartphone market. They will still lead in integrated devices plus AI. What I will stress is that this approval confirms that regulatory trust and government are quite critical in China, along with raw model performance. Essentially, in that dimension, Alibaba has just been formally recognized as a partner that can keep global AI within China's guardrails. Bloomberg Intelligence Senior Consumer and Technology Analyst Catherine Lim there. Well, Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron have been enjoying their dominant position in the global DRAM and high bandwidth chip market. But our Bloomberg opinion column, Julie Renn, warns that China’s CXMT is starting to look like an upstart that could disrupt their joyride. So should these dominant players be worried? I think so. At this point, CXMT has the momentum; it has been grabbing market share from the big three, doubling its market share to 8% from just 4% a year ago. In addition, CXMT is seeking a Shanghai IPO with the hope of raising US$10 billion. $10 billion is a lot of money in China. We know Chinese factories build them very fast. And CXMT is not slowing down.
Analysis

The approval of the Apple deal does not eliminate competition from Huawei or Xiaomi in the smartphone sector, but it does highlight the importance of regulatory trust in China, with Alibaba recognized as a key partner in maintaining global AI standards. Meanwhile, CXMT is gaining traction in the DRAM market, doubling its market share and planning a significant IPO, which could disrupt established players like Samsung and Micron.

17:35
PDT
TSMC's spending guidance may increase beyond $56 billion.
TSMCASMLUBSAICFOBloomberg IntelligencePCPRIVATE
– Strong revenue growth reported, but stock response has been muted.
– AI and server processor demand is expected to offset smartphone and PC weaknesses.
– Potential for price increases could enhance gross margins.
– Market expectations for TSMC may be too high.
semiconductor investmentAI demandmarket expectations
▸ Full transcript
As big as a client would have some pushback on, and indications are that they would push back on that. So there's lots to dig into, obviously with TSMC coming out with these results later and then also executive guidance, and then we have an interview as well with the CFO of TSMC tomorrow. With that ASML outlook, could we actually see TSMC increasing spending beyond the previous guidance? Yeah, that's what we're really going to be looking for because previous guidance was for outlays of upwards of $56 billion this year. And UBS, for one, is saying that number could be upwards of $60 billion. So any kind of firm outlook change would be something that we'll be looking at. I mean revenue has been doing well. We had those second quarter numbers; essentially, the June numbers were up 68%. And we can equate that for the second quarter of a jump of 36%. But again, the stock has not necessarily responded that greatly to those numbers, even though a 68% jump. Maybe the expectations for this are a little bit too high. So we'll have to look deeper into that as well. So BIAs take Bloomberg Intelligence. June sales reinforce our view that AI and server processor demand will comfortably offset smartphone and PC weakness, strengthening the case for price increases that should lift gross margins outlook above.
Analysis

TSMC's upcoming results are highly anticipated, with expectations for increased spending potentially exceeding previous guidance of $56 billion, as UBS suggests it could reach $60 billion. Despite a strong revenue performance, the stock has not reacted positively, indicating that market expectations may be overly high.

The demand for AI and server processors is expected to offset weaknesses in the smartphone and PC sectors, which could lead to price increases and improved gross margins. This shift highlights the resilience of the semiconductor sector amidst broader market volatility, particularly in light of geopolitical tensions affecting energy prices.

17:32
PDT
KOSPI is under pressure from regulatory concerns over leveraged ETFs.
KOSPIASMLTSMCNvidiaAustraliaKoreaBOKAIsemiconductorsenergy stocksU.S.IranKOSPICL=FNVDA
– Oil prices are climbing, benefiting Australian energy stocks.
– ASML raised its full-year guidance, indicating strong demand.
– TSMC's upcoming earnings are pivotal for assessing AI spending sustainability.
– Volatility in Korean markets is linked to ETF regulations and energy prices.
regulatory riskAI investmentenergy pricessemiconductor demand
▸ Full transcript
Still 2.7% lower when it comes to Japanese stocks at the moment. We also have the BOK decision at some point this hour to contend with, but it really is this potential regulatory action that we could see when it comes to the single stock leveraged ETFs, which have really been the big contributor when it comes to some of the volatility and rotations that we've seen increasingly so out of these Korean markets. So that's why we are seeing that big drag for the KOSPI at the moment, waiting for that announcement. At the same time though, that energy trade continues, oil climbing for a fourth consecutive day. We're seeing Australian energy stocks again benefiting. But it is really about where to in terms of the next catalyst for this AI and chip-related trade right. Mark is closely now watching up for earnings from two of Nvidia's key suppliers in the region. TSMC is set to report later on Thursday, and our chief North Asia correspondent Stephen Engel joins us now from Taipei. What are we looking out for in terms of these numbers today, Steve? Absolutely pivotal week that global investors are looking at to see if the spending patterns in AI are sustainable. ASML was the first one overnight. Obviously, the numbers were pretty good. It raised its net profit, raised its full-year net sales guidance, I should say, for a second time already this year. And it was a fairly tepid response. As you mentioned, at the top, Heidi, as chip stocks fell again. So attention sort of turns now to TSMC, a top client of ASML. One of the...
Analysis

Korean markets are experiencing volatility due to potential regulatory actions on single stock leveraged ETFs, contributing to a decline in the KOSPI. Meanwhile, energy stocks are benefiting from rising oil prices, and attention is shifting to upcoming earnings reports from key suppliers like TSMC, which could indicate the sustainability of AI spending patterns.

Despite the recent dip in chip stocks, ASML's positive earnings and raised guidance suggest underlying strength in the semiconductor sector. Investors should closely monitor TSMC's results, as they may provide critical insights into demand dynamics and the future trajectory of AI-related investments.

17:28
PDT
Gold prices steady with cooler U.S. inflation data.
U.S.IranSouth KoreaBank of KoreaIEAFatih BirolCPIPPIBOKWatch Wall Street WeekWall Street WeekMiddle EasternCL=FGC=F
– Oil prices remain uncertain due to U.S.-Iran tensions.
– South Korea's inflation at a two-year high may prompt rate hikes.
– Semiconductor sector growth continues despite inflation concerns.
– Market volatility expected as asset prices react to geopolitical developments.
inflation riskgeopolitical tensionssemiconductor growth
▸ Full transcript
That $160 billion in Trump tariffs is not as easy as it looks. How much of that have you realized? None. Watch Wall Street Week. More than what you need to know, it's what you need to think about. Join me each week on Wall Street Week for stories of capitalism from business, markets, economics, tech, and climate. More than what you need to know, it's what you need to think about. We're seeing gold prices pretty steady as we got cooler U.S. inflation data, not just CPI yesterday but PPI in the overnight session as well. But of course, the variable right now is what happens to oil prices, given that we continue to see the U.S.-Iran negotiations ongoing, the U.S. continuing its airstrikes. We just heard from the IEA head, Fatih Birol, saying that this could escalate into a crisis unless we open up the Strait of Hormuz. But inflation expectations, not to mention the price of oil, are important for South Korea. Very reliant on Middle Eastern imports, but also the fact that inflation is now at the fastest level in about two months. We continue to see the volatility when it comes to asset prices around Korea on the day when we are getting the BOK rate decision. All expectations for a hike at the moment, as I mentioned earlier, inflation at the fastest in two years, above that 3 percent level for CPI and of course growth being boosted by the semi-.
Analysis

Gold prices remain steady amid cooler U.S. inflation data, but oil prices are a variable due to ongoing U.S.-Iran negotiations and potential escalation into a crisis. South Korea's inflation is at its fastest level in two years, which may influence the Bank of Korea's upcoming rate decision.

The market is currently digesting the implications of rising inflation and potential interest rate hikes, particularly in South Korea, which is heavily reliant on Middle Eastern oil imports. Investors should be cautious of volatility in asset prices as the situation develops, especially with the semiconductor sector contributing to growth amidst these inflationary pressures.

17:25
PDT
Global equities expected to rise with 20% earnings growth.
ChinaJapanSK HynixSamsung ElectronicsFinancial Services CommissionBank of KoreaFinancial Supervisory ServiceFinance MinistriesAIUSDCNH
– China to invest $300 billion in AI ecosystem over five years.
– AI hardware stocks in China poised for long-term success.
– Short-term recovery anticipated for undervalued internet players.
– Asian markets, especially Japan, offer AI investment opportunities.
AI investmentglobal equity growthAsian market opportunities
▸ Full transcript
Despite all the concerns about the energy crisis and also the AI capex, from here, I think the gains will be more difficult. So all these are headlines, definitely not good for the market perspective, but as long as the earnings hold, then the market will go higher. For global equities, we are still expecting markets to go higher because earnings will be up more than 20% this year. We've talked at length about the opportunities in Korea, and they're pretty well viewed at the moment. Are there other geographic markets for the AI tech theme that perhaps present better opportunities in terms of value, China or Japan for example? Yeah, if you look at the Asian markets, pretty much all the markets I would say they offer AI opportunities. Japan is a classic case, and now we are seeing that momentum in China as well. So if you look at the onshore market in China, the hardware stocks have been doing extremely well because China is going to spend $300 billion over the next five years to build its own AI ecosystem. And there will be no competition for those Chinese companies. So from a long-term perspective, the AI hardware stocks in China, I think they can do extremely well. At the same time, in the short term, the internet players should recover because valuations are very cheap and they are able to monetize the AI investment into their existing operations.
Analysis

Global equities are expected to rise as earnings are projected to increase by over 20% this year, despite concerns regarding the energy crisis and AI capital expenditures. Asian markets, particularly China and Japan, present significant opportunities in the AI tech sector, with China planning to invest $300 billion over the next five years to develop its own AI ecosystem.

Smart money should note that while the short-term outlook for internet players in China appears cheap, the long-term potential for AI hardware stocks is substantial due to a lack of competition. This dynamic could lead to a robust recovery in the Chinese market, driven by both hardware advancements and internet monetization of AI investments.

17:22
PDT
Korean stocks are digesting gains after a 100% rally.
KoreaTaiwanEuropeAIsemiconductorsCEMIsFinancial Services CommissionBank of KoreaFinancial Supervisory ServiceFinance Ministries
– Strong fundamentals in the semiconductor sector persist.
– Demand in the AI space is driving growth.
– Equipment manufacturers are favored due to capacity constraints.
– Foundries are expected to see earnings growth of 30-40%.
semiconductor demandAI monetizationmarket volatilityinvestment opportunities
▸ Full transcript
What are the steps being taken by authorities when it comes to these leveraged ETFs with the single stocks? I think it's quite natural that after a 100% rally, you tend to see some sort of digestion in the market and profit booking, and that's what we are seeing in the Korean market right now. But don't forget that the fundamentals are still very strong. Some of these companies are not able to fulfill even 70% of the demand in the semi-space. And if you look at the end customers, the monetization of the AI space is playing out. So as long as you have monetization of the AI in the space and a demand-supply imbalance, it's quite likely that these stocks will recover. So we are still bullish on the Korean equity market, and I think this is only a mid-cycle digestion. What does the selectivity within CEMIs look like for your strategy? Yeah. Looking at semis, we prefer first semi-equipment because there is a shortness of equipment manufacturers, and given the capacity constraint, it's quite likely that this is going to last for a couple of years. So some of the players in Taiwan and some of the players in Europe have done extremely well, and we heard from a company last night as well that they raised the guidance because they are not able to fulfill the demand. Foundries, I think, still look very good because the earnings growth for the next couple of years would be more than 30-40%.
Analysis

Korean stocks are experiencing a pullback after a significant rally, driven by profit-taking amidst strong fundamentals in the semiconductor sector. Despite current volatility, demand for semiconductors remains robust, particularly in the AI space, suggesting a potential recovery for these stocks.

Smart money should note that the ongoing supply-demand imbalance in semiconductors, coupled with capacity constraints, positions certain equipment manufacturers and foundries for substantial earnings growth over the next few years. This mid-cycle digestion phase may present buying opportunities in the semiconductor market, particularly for companies that are unable to meet demand.

17:20
PDT
Korean assets down 5.5% due to ETF volatility.
South KoreaSK HynixSamsung ElectronicsFinancial Services CommissionBank of KoreaFinancial Supervisory ServiceFinance MinistriesAIETFSKFSCThe Financial Services CommissionPRIVATE
– Regulatory measures expected from the Financial Services Commission.
– Potential temporary trading halts for leveraged ETFs.
– Close consultations among financial authorities ongoing.
– Market stability remains a key focus for regulators.
market volatilityregulatory scrutiny
▸ Full transcript
The trading day is about to start, and you're already looking for that edge. The opening trade brings you everything you need to know as markets open across Europe. Take a look at the big move that we're seeing in Korean assets at the moment. This volatility that we've seen increasingly build as a result of this leveraged AI ETF trade has really come to a head. We're seeing a downside of five and a half percent at the moment, on expectations that South Korea will soon announce measures regarding the controversy over some of these leveraged ETF vehicles that are linked to the likes of SK Hynix and Samsung Electronics and their contribution to stock market volatility. The Financial Services Commission has made statements on YouTube saying that these close consultations are underway with the so-called F4: the Bank of Korea, the FSC, the Financial Supervisory Service, as well as the Finance Ministries to protect investors and ensure market stability. We're expecting that announcement; they're reviewing the matter comprehensively. They weren't really commenting as to whether we could see a temporary trading halt for these leveraged ETFs linked to Samsung and SK Hynix.
Analysis

Korean assets are experiencing significant volatility, with a downside of 5.5% amid expectations of imminent regulatory measures regarding leveraged ETFs linked to major companies like SK Hynix and Samsung Electronics. The Financial Services Commission is conducting comprehensive reviews to protect investors and ensure market stability, hinting at potential temporary trading halts for these ETFs.

Smart money should note that the regulatory scrutiny on leveraged ETFs could lead to increased market instability in the short term, particularly for stocks heavily tied to these financial instruments. Investors should prepare for potential shifts in trading dynamics as the government seeks to mitigate risks associated with these products.

17:17
PDT
U.S.-China summit aims for relationship stability.
President TrumpPresident XiChinaUnited StatesBloomberg TVAmbassador JamesonSherryUSTVAmbassador GehrerDavid GuraPRIVATEUSDCNH
– Focus on Chinese compliance with agricultural and rare earth commitments.
– No comprehensive agreement expected from the meeting.
– Ongoing challenges in U.S.-China relations remain.
– Market volatility may persist in related sectors.
U.S.-China relationstrade complianceagricultural productsrare earth elements
▸ Full transcript
Chinese president comes to the United States. But let me ask you, lastly, how you're thinking about that. You were so integral to conversations that took place in Beijing. What are you expecting, deliverables-wise, to come out of that meeting in Washington in a couple of months? Well, the number one deliverable we always have between President Trump and President Xi is to continue the stability of the relationship. Both of these leaders are very committed to having a strong and solid personal relationship. Now that doesn't mean we don't have issues. In the broader relationship, obviously we do. China is a big challenge for the US in a lot of ways, but we want to make sure we're delivering stability. There's never been a situation where the US side or even the Chinese side has gone out and said everyone should expect a comprehensive agreement that resolves all issues. No one's ever promised that, so that's not what we expect. We will have an opportunity to take stock of Chinese commitments with respect to purchases of soybeans and other agricultural products. We'll take stock on the rare earth issues we decided. So I think it will be a moment for stock taking, confirming the relationship, making sure that China is complying with what it's agreed to do. That's really what we're looking forward to in this meeting. Ambassador Gehrer, thank you very much. I appreciate the time. Thanks for your time. That's Ambassador Jameson. We're joining me here in Aspen, Colorado. Sherry, I'll send it back to you. Yeah, and our thanks to Bloomberg TV, David Gura, as well as we continue to look ahead to that U.S.-China summit again. More ahead, this is Bloomberg.
Analysis

The upcoming U.S.-China summit is expected to focus on stabilizing the bilateral relationship, with an emphasis on Chinese compliance regarding agricultural purchases and rare earth commitments. While no comprehensive agreement is anticipated, the meeting will serve as a crucial moment for assessing ongoing commitments and addressing existing challenges in the relationship.

Smart money should note that the emphasis on stability and compliance suggests a cautious approach to U.S.-China relations, which may impact market sentiment and investment strategies in sectors reliant on trade with China. The lack of a comprehensive agreement indicates that volatility may persist, particularly in commodities and agricultural markets.

17:12
PDT
U.S. to announce actions against Brazil for unfair trading practices.
BrazilVietnamSwitzerlandU.S.PresidentSenator Lindsey GrahamSenator Richard BlumenthalF4BIOCSo ChinaPresident TrumpUSDCNH
– Negotiations with Switzerland show potential for a 15% trade deal.
– Focus on rare earths indicates strategic economic concerns.
– Ongoing investigations into Vietnam may lead to further tariffs.
– U.S. trade surplus with Switzerland marks a positive development.
trade relationsrare earthstariff actionseconomic coercion
▸ Full transcript
To the letter of the law and the spirit of the law. We want to make sure that we're targeting these unfair trading practices that have led to, frankly, offshoring in the U.S. and an inability to build new factories at times. When you have other countries that are building factories or they're depressing demand in their own country, this is not how market economics are supposed to work. And it creates a situation where there's not enough incentive to build a new factory in America or to employ American workers because we have overcapacity elsewhere. So we want to make sure that that capacity is restrained, restricted, or that we mitigate it somehow in our own economy so we can have market incentives to build here and to make here. I want to ask you about rare earths, and I wonder how you would assess China's performance when it comes to rare earths, and as we get closer to October, do you anticipate that that agreement will be renewed in due course? So China's compliance with the rare earth elements of our agreements, it's not perfect. I think everyone knows that. You can read that in the paper. That being said, we are getting a flow of rare earths. We don't have factories shutting down because they don't have it. But again, we really want to be in a position where we were in 2024 and 2023, in President Trump's first term, where we had a regular flow of rare earths. We also know that the Chinese, they use rare earths for economic coercion. They did it in 2010 and 2011. They're doing it now. So it's not necessarily surprising, but we're continuing to have some flow and where we have gaps, where we have problems, the sector of the trade.
Analysis

The U.S. is preparing to take action against Brazil for unfair trading practices, including restrictions on digital tech and agricultural exports. Meanwhile, negotiations with Switzerland are progressing positively, with a potential 15% deal on the horizon, reflecting a shift towards a trade surplus for the U.S. with Switzerland.

Smart money should note the ongoing investigations into Brazil and Vietnam, which could lead to significant tariff actions that may impact U.S. exporters. Additionally, the focus on rare earths and China's compliance highlights the strategic importance of these materials in U.S. economic policy, especially as tensions with China persist.

17:10
PDT
U.S. Section 301 tariffs targeting Brazil and Vietnam are imminent.
BrazilVietnamSwitzerlandNVIDIAJensen HuangSK HynixSamsungBank of KoreaU.S. governmentSection 301Section 122financial services CommissionMETA
– Focus on forced labor and structural excess capacity in trade practices.
– Expiration of Section 122 tariffs may create temporary coverage gaps.
– Positive trade surplus with Switzerland suggests improving relations.
– Market volatility expected as tariffs are enacted.
trade policytariffsunfair trading practicesinternational relations
▸ Full transcript
To hit the right spot of putting pressure on countries and putting pressure on Russia without creating more conflict or reducing the likelihood of a peace deal. The Section 122 tariffs are set to expire in just a couple of days, really, a few days from now, July 24th. All but certain that the 301 tariffs could affect after that, are we looking at perhaps a lapse kind of in coverage? I mean, the reality is the Section 301 investigations I'm doing where we've proposed some tariffs, they're on their own track. We're moving quickly and deliberately because we want to resolve the unfair trading practices that we're targeting with these investigations. So we're going to do them as soon as we can to get at these practices, you know, whether they're, you know, day before, day of, day after. That's less important to us than making sure we're addressing these unfair trading practices and getting the leverage in place we need to resolve them. Do you have a timetable for when you're going to bring that report to the president when you might see them enacted? Well, we have a couple, right? So we have a Section 301 on forced labor targeting countries who don't ban the import of forced labor goods. We do in America, other countries don't. Some have a law, but they don't necessarily enforce it. So we already have our report out on that, and so we can take action, I think fairly quickly on that within the next few weeks. We have another investigation targeting a more compact group of countries on structural excess capacity. These are countries who typically have a big trade deficit with the world, or a big trade surplus with us, or even if they don't, they may have practices that generate factories or production.
Analysis

The U.S. is preparing to implement Section 301 tariffs targeting unfair trading practices, particularly against Brazil and Vietnam, with a focus on forced labor and structural excess capacity. The urgency of these actions is underscored by the impending expiration of Section 122 tariffs, prompting swift resolutions to address these issues.

Smart money should note the potential for increased market volatility as these tariffs could impact trade dynamics significantly, especially in sectors reliant on imports from the targeted countries. Additionally, the ongoing negotiations with Switzerland and the positive trade surplus indicate a shift in U.S.-Swiss relations that could influence investment flows.

17:08
PDT
U.S. trade surplus with Switzerland indicates positive investment trends.
SwitzerlandUnited StatesBrazilVietnamSenator Lindsey GrahamSenator Richard BlumenthalNVIDIAJensen HuangThe SwissWhite HousePRIVATE
– Negotiations with Switzerland aim for a stable 15% deal.
– Ongoing investigations into unfair trading practices with Brazil and Vietnam.
– Sanctions bill includes tariff elements to pressure Russia.
– Intellectual property concerns remain a key focus in trade discussions.
trade negotiationseconomic securitysanctionsintellectual property
▸ Full transcript
We want them to do so as well. So I have a separate investigation with Vietnam involving intellectual property because they've been a bad actor in this space. So these are the types of things, intellectual property, economic security, where we still have open areas of discussion. Switzerland's top trade diplomat told Bloomberg there's a good chance they'll get to a 15% deal, something stable. Can you confirm that, that negotiations with Switzerland are going well? Well, I know that that's what they want. I know that is the substance of a framework agreement we agreed to a few months ago. One interesting thing with Switzerland, we've been very concerned with our trade deficit with Switzerland, but over the past six to seven months, the United States is now in surplus with Switzerland in goods. So that's a really positive development. The Swiss are investing here in America. In fact, this week I'm going to visit a plant in Utah where they are producing railway equipment. It's a Swiss company. They're coming here. They're bringing their apprenticeship programs. So the Swiss are doing a lot of the things they need to do to get right with the U.S. Negotiations are still ongoing, so I can't guarantee anything, but there's positive direction there. Ask about the sanctions bill newly elevated after the passing of Senator Lindsey Graham. Senator Richard Blumenthal said you've been involved in conversations about that. Is it in a place now that the White House, that you and the White House are happy with? So there are a lot of elements to this bill. There's a tariff element. There's a sanctions element, all of which are designed to give the president discretion to deploy pressure on Russia and those who are supporting Russia. So we've worked very constructively with the Senate on this. There are a lot of good things to be said about it. I just spoke with the president about it as well. So.
Analysis

Negotiations between the U.S. and Switzerland are progressing positively, with a potential 15% deal on the horizon, marking a shift from a trade deficit to a surplus in goods. The U.S. is also addressing unfair trading practices with Brazil and Vietnam, indicating a broader strategy to enhance economic security and intellectual property protections.

The shift to a trade surplus with Switzerland suggests increasing investment and collaboration, which could stabilize bilateral relations. Additionally, the focus on sanctions and tariffs against Russia reflects a strategic use of economic tools to exert pressure, which may influence market sentiment and geopolitical dynamics.

17:05
PDT
U.S. to announce actions against Brazil for unfair trading practices.
BrazilU.S.PresidentSection 301The PresidentAMZN
– Negotiations with Brazil have not closed existing gaps.
– Tariffs may be used as leverage in trade discussions.
– Concerns over illegal deforestation impacting ag exports.
– Potential market volatility in agriculture and tech sectors.
trade tensionstariff leverageagricultural exportsdigital tech access
▸ Full transcript
We have two sets of hearings. We do two sets of public comments. And we're focused on unfair trading practices by Brazil. We have to have a legal basis to do this. There are all kinds of things that Brazil has been doing. They've been censoring our digital tech companies. They've been restricting our access for ethanol to their market. They've been engaging in illegal deforestation in the Amazon, which gives them a leg up on all the agriculture where they displace our agricultural exports to third countries. So there are a lot of things like this that have been a prompt for a long time with Brazil. So we've been investigating this. Today we'll announce our final action. I had a conversation, a video conversation with my counterpart in Brazil last night. It was very cordial. We've had intensive negotiations with them. I think there are still a lot of gaps between us, so we probably have to have some kind of action, but then continued discussions, I think. Expectation 25% in line with what you're thinking in terms of the range? Well, this is what was proposed by my office at the President's direction. So this is probably what we're looking at. Again, I don't want to get ahead of the President. He's signing something today. I just got off the phone with him. And so we'll have more details to come. But again, I just want to emphasize these are unfair trading practices that Brazil has had in place against American exporters and workers for many years. The President is trying to resolve these. We're doing it by negotiation, where we need to use the leverage of tariffs. That's what we're allowed to do with Section 301. We'll do that where it's necessary.
Analysis

The U.S. is preparing to announce final actions against Brazil due to unfair trading practices, including restrictions on digital tech companies and illegal deforestation impacting agricultural exports. Negotiations have been ongoing, but significant gaps remain, indicating potential tariff leverage may be employed to resolve these issues.

Smart money should note that the U.S. administration is willing to escalate trade tensions with Brazil, which could lead to broader implications for agricultural and tech sectors. The focus on tariffs as a negotiation tool suggests a strategic shift that may influence market sentiment and investment flows in related industries.

17:03
PDT
Korean growth forecasts are being upgraded by both government and private analysts.
SK HynixKorean wonKospiFinancial Services CommissionFinance MinistryBank of KoreaUSSKADRThe KoreanDXY
– The Kospi index is highly volatile, reflecting investor uncertainty.
– Government consultations are ongoing regarding single stock leveraged ETFs.
– The Korean won shows strength against the US dollar.
– Market reactions may intensify based on government announcements.
market volatilityKorean economic outlookETF regulation
▸ Full transcript
We're seeing growth forecasts for the country being upgraded both from the government and private analysts as well. The Korean won, though, continues to be a little bit pressured against a greenback; it's seen a little bit of strength, trading around two-month highs against the US dollar because of expectations of repatriation of funds coming from SK Hynix ADR listings and more domestic investments. However, the Kospi right now is losing more than 4%, but remember, it's a very volatile market. As you said, the Kospi is just coming off its best day in months and now we're seeing a drop of almost 5%. We could really see further losses, particularly if more details come as to what the government is planning to do on these single stock leveraged ETFs. We're expecting soon measures to be announced, according to the Financial Services Commission head speaking in a YouTube program, saying that close consultations are underway with the so-called F4, the Finance Ministry, and the Bank of Korea.
Analysis

The Korean won is trading at two-month highs against the US dollar, driven by expectations of repatriation of funds from SK Hynix ADR listings and increased domestic investments. However, the Kospi index is experiencing significant volatility, currently down over 4%, as market participants await government measures regarding single stock leveraged ETFs.

17:00
PDT
BOK expected to raise rates by 25 basis points today.
Bank of KoreaSK HynixSamsungNVIDIAJensen HuangBrazilBloomberg EconomicsHyosung KwonPresident TrumpUSAISKPRIVATENVDA
– Market has already priced in the rate hike.
– Volatility in South Korean markets driven by single stock ETFs.
– K-shaped recovery suggests uneven economic benefits.
– Regulators may address ETF-related market volatility.
interest rate policymarket volatilitysemiconductor sectorK-shaped recovery
▸ Full transcript
Get ahead of tomorrow's trading with the close weekdays on Bloomberg. Context changes everything. I'm Michael McKee on the Mexican border, and this is Bloomberg. This is the Asia trade war counting down to Asia's major market opens. We're watching the US continue airstrikes against Iran, not to mention that we're seeing the AI trade still pretty volatile. Two themes that would be very important for South Korea as they gauge inflationary pressures and the volatility around semiconductors on this Bank of Korea decision day. I love that the Bank of Korea decision is almost the least dramatic of today's events that we're watching out for, right? But you're absolutely right. It is that rotation in and out of tech, the volatility, and so much of that volatility, as you know, Sherry, is being derived by these single stock ETFs, SK Hynix, Samsung. We are expecting that regulators and financial regulators and the government might be thinking about doing something about that. Anything related to semiconductors, the AI trade, is also very important for Japan as we have NVIDIA's Jensen Huang here.
Analysis

The Bank of Korea is expected to raise interest rates by 25 basis points today, driven by inflationary pressures and growth in the chip sector. However, the market has already priced in this hike, leading to questions about the pace and duration of future rate increases amidst rising volatility in the South Korean market.

Smart money should note that while the BOK is likely to adopt a gradual tightening approach, the ongoing volatility from single stock ETFs could complicate the economic landscape. The K-shaped recovery in South Korea indicates that not all sectors are benefiting equally, which may influence the BOK's policy decisions moving forward.

16:58
PDT
Regulatory friction is a key concern for deal-making.
JP MorganLizzie BurdenBloombergJPTFStarten Sie Ihre SucheErster SteinMiss BloombergBloomberg DaybreakFEDFUNDS
– Strategic planning is essential to navigate potential obstacles.
– Firms may adopt a more cautious approach to M&A.
– Increased complexity in the regulatory landscape.
– Proactive measures could mitigate risks in deal approvals.
regulatory riskM&A strategy
▸ Full transcript
Starten Sie Ihre Suche nach JP Morgan in Kami-TF. Erster Stein. Are there deals that you've looked at that you've maybe advised on or you've said, look, this looks possible that it'll get past federal regulators, but it won't in the state? And that's a reason maybe to not pursue a deal. Is that occurring right now? I think the conversation is more about here's an area where you may run into some friction and here's some steps that you may want to take in the planning process to make sure that when you encounter that friction, you're fully prepared to deal with it. Miss Bloomberg deals live every week. Good morning, this is Bloomberg Daybreak here at I'm Lizzie Burden in London and these are the stories that set your agenda.
Analysis

The conversation highlights potential friction in regulatory approvals for deals, emphasizing the importance of strategic planning to navigate these challenges. This suggests that firms may need to be more proactive in their approach to deal-making to avoid pitfalls with regulators.

Smart money should note that while some deals may seem viable, the regulatory landscape is increasingly complex, and firms must prepare for potential obstacles. This could lead to a more cautious approach in M&A activities, impacting market dynamics and valuations.

16:57
PDT
Korean markets are volatile with significant futures declines.
Niko FuturesSaul Cosby FuturesU.S. trade representativeJamson GreerKorean marketsfinance ministryPresident TrumpAspen Security ForumPRIVATE
– Regulatory discussions on ETFs may impact market dynamics.
– Conversations with U.S. trade representatives could influence policy.
– Market stability may hinge on regulatory outcomes.
– Investors should monitor the evolving landscape of ETFs.
market volatilityregulatory scrutinyinternational trade policy
▸ Full transcript
From the most recent social media posts from President Trump. Niko Futures looking like this 2% lower there, just about, and Saul Cosby Futures by 5%. We're also expecting potentially some conversations to be held in the upper echelons of regulators of the government, the finance ministry, to talk about the impact of some of these ETFs that have been at the core of the volatility and the rotation and swings that have been taking place in Korean markets. In the next hour, some great conversations coming up too; we'll be speaking exclusively with the U.S. trade representative Jamson Greer on the issues shaping Washington's policy agenda that's coming to us live from the Aspen Security Forum in Colorado. In the meantime, we're headed towards the market opens in Sydney, Seoul, and Tokyo next. This is Bloomberg. Not every signal is a signal to act. Trading analytics that surface the context and leave the decision with you.
Analysis

Korean markets are experiencing volatility, with Niko Futures down 2% and Saul Cosby Futures down 5%. Regulatory discussions are anticipated regarding the impact of ETFs on market swings, indicating a potential shift in policy focus that could affect trading strategies.

Smart money should note that the upcoming conversations with U.S. trade representatives may signal changes in Washington's policy agenda that could influence international trade dynamics. Additionally, the focus on ETFs suggests that regulatory scrutiny could lead to increased market stability or further volatility depending on the outcomes of these discussions.

16:54
PDT
Morgan Stanley's wealth management business thrived due to IPOs, particularly SpaceX.
Morgan StanleyTed PigNeil SarpzGoldman SachsBrian MonehanJPMorganJamie DimonAnthropicOpenAIBank of AmericaBank of KoreaHyosung Kwon
– Goldman Sachs reported the best investment banking fees since 2021, indicating strong market activity.
– The Bank of Korea is likely to raise rates gradually, with a focus on managing volatility.
– Economic growth in South Korea is uneven, with some sectors struggling despite overall GDP upgrades.
– The introduction of single stock leverage ETFs is amplifying market volatility.
IPO activitymonetary policymarket volatilityeconomic inequality
▸ Full transcript
The margin in the Cosby market is at a historically high level. At the same time, the single stock leverage ETF launched in May is amplifying the volatility. This is related to financial imbalances; the BOK will tighten policy to lean against the wind. Higher volatility means that the BOK policymakers do not want to add another layer of volatility by raising interest rates rapidly or with a jumbo hike. A good compromise will be a gradual tightening cycle. South Korea currently has a little bit of leeway regarding growth; GDP expectations have been upgraded even by the government. However, many sectors are struggling, particularly the self-employed and the construction sector, which continues to decline.
Analysis

Morgan Stanley reported a strong quarter with $148 billion in net new assets, significantly benefiting from IPOs like SpaceX. The Bank of Korea is expected to adopt a gradual tightening cycle amid rising GDP expectations, despite economic inequality and sector struggles.

The capital markets are experiencing heightened volatility, influenced by the launch of a single stock leverage ETF, which may complicate the BOK's policy decisions. Smart money should note the potential for a K-shaped recovery in South Korea, which could impact future monetary policy and investment strategies.

16:52
PDT
SK Hynix ADR flows show initial strength.
SK HynixBank of KoreaBloomberg EconomicsHyosung KwonSKADRKOSPIAIBOKSouth KoreanKorea DayIts KoreaADRPRIVATE
– Korean won weak against the US dollar.
– Bank of Korea expected to raise rates by 25 basis points.
– Market has priced in the rate hike.
– Focus on the pace of future interest rate increases.
interest rate policySouth Korean economyAI-driven growth
▸ Full transcript
We saw a little bit of strength given the expectation that we would see those SK Hynix ADR-related flows back into the South Korean economy were passed at the 1500 level, but a little bit of weakness against the greenback in today's session. Not to mention that we're seeing that downside in the future space, SK Hynix also potentially losing 6 percent. We have of course already seen the best day in the KOSPI in about a month and the Korean won also trading at around the highs that we haven't seen in about two months. All of this coming at a time when it's Bank of Korea Day. Bloomberg Economics says the AI-driven chip boom, Brazilian growth, and persistent inflation give the BOK room to raise rates by 25 basis points today. Its Korea economist Hyosung Kwon joins us now with more on this. And it seems that that hike is already priced in by the market as Hyosung. So what will you be watching today? As you mentioned that hike today is largely expected, but the bigger question is how fast and how far the BOK will raise interest rates and how long it will maintain the high interest rate in the restrictive area. My view is that the BOK will take gradual steps, so it will raise interest rates 25 basis points every quarter until the first half of next year.
Analysis

The South Korean economy is experiencing mixed signals as the SK Hynix ADR flows show strength, yet the Korean won is facing weakness against the US dollar. The Bank of Korea is expected to raise interest rates by 25 basis points today, driven by factors such as the AI-driven chip boom and persistent inflation.

Smart money should note that while the rate hike is largely priced in, the pace and duration of future increases will be critical. The Bank of Korea's gradual approach may indicate a longer-term strategy to maintain high interest rates, impacting market expectations and investment flows.

16:47
PDT
Bank of America to highlight strong quarterly results.
Bank of AmericaBrian MoynihanJPMorganJamie DimonAnthropicMythosOpenAICEOAIIPOPRIVATE
– JPMorgan's Dimon raises alarms over AI risks.
– Anthropic's Mythos model poses significant security concerns.
– Anthropic plans potential IPO ahead of OpenAI's timeline.
– Market is closely monitoring AI regulatory developments.
AI regulationIPO activityfinancial sector performance
▸ Full transcript
Bank of America's chairman and CEO Brian Moynihan will be joining Bloomberg's surveillance leader today. The conversation will be focused on his company's blowout quarterly performance and outlook for the rest of the year as well. We are also hearing from JPMorgan's CEO Jamie Dimon warning about the risk of making a sophisticated AI system like Anthropic's Mythos model widely available, comparing it to a ballistic missile. Market advancements in AI have both businesses and government assessing potential threats. The issue took on more urgency after Anthropic said its Mythos model is so good at finding software vulnerabilities that it cannot be released to the general public. Mythos is a real issue, which I know our government is on top of at this point. It's not to stop small banks from gaining; it's really just to make sure we roll out the stuff that we know is being controlled because you're giving ballistic missiles to individuals with Mythos, basically. We have been told that Anthropic is seeking to meet with investors ahead of its potential mega IPO. Banks leading the offering are scheduling meetings between investors and the company in the coming weeks. Bloomberg earlier reported that Anthropic is considering an IPO as soon as October, putting it ahead of rival OpenAI's potential listing in 2027.
Analysis

Bank of America CEO Brian Moynihan will discuss the company's strong quarterly performance and future outlook, while JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon warns about the risks of releasing advanced AI systems like Anthropic's Mythos model, likening it to a ballistic missile. The urgency surrounding AI advancements is growing, especially after concerns were raised about Mythos's capabilities in identifying software vulnerabilities, leading to discussions about a potential IPO for Anthropic as early as October.

16:45
PDT
Morgan Stanley's wealth management business saw $148 billion in net new assets.
Morgan StanleySpaceXGoldman SachsNeil SarpzUSTed PigWall StreetBloomberg IntelligenceSo NeilPRIVATEGC=F
– SpaceX's IPO significantly contributed to Morgan Stanley's strong quarter.
– Equities trading and investment banking fees were robust across major firms.
– Goldman Sachs reported its best fees since 2021, with an increasing investment banking backlog.
– Capital market expectations remain high, indicating potential for continued strong performance.
IPO activityinvestment banking trendscapital markets performance
▸ Full transcript
Morgan Stanley's chief Ted Pig spoke about the outlook for M&A. His bank and its Wall Street peers have been raking in fees from advising on deals. Morgan Stanley also had a blowout quarter, hauling in $148 billion of net new assets in its wealth management business in the second quarter. Over half of that was tied to IPOs, including, of course, SpaceX's record-breaking listing. For more, my Bloomberg Intelligence US financials analyst Neil Sarpz joins us now. So Neil, take us through these numbers. How much of an anomaly was it, particularly with something like SpaceX? Yeah, I think there's no doubt that SpaceX was a pretty significant benefit across a franchise like Morgan Stanley and across the other largest US competitors that have reported over the past two days. I think what we learned from results is the capital market's expectations and the hype, if you will, around that business really funneled through in the second quarter. We had blowout numbers in equities trading, and investment banking fees were really strong across all of the lines, including, of course, IPOs. And I think what's encouraging to see is, you know, most of the management teams have been talking about pipelines being full, and most notably Goldman Sachs, who posted the best fees since the record year of 2021, talked about actually an increase in the investment banking backlog, even in spite of...
Analysis

Morgan Stanley reported a blowout quarter with $148 billion in net new assets, significantly boosted by IPOs like SpaceX. The strong performance in equities trading and investment banking fees indicates a robust capital market environment, with management teams noting full pipelines and increasing backlogs, particularly at Goldman Sachs.

The notable impact of SpaceX on Morgan Stanley's results highlights the importance of high-profile IPOs in driving financial performance. Additionally, the increase in investment banking backlog suggests sustained demand for advisory services, which could lead to further fee generation in the coming quarters.

16:41
PDT
NVIDIA remains the preferred supplier for AI chips.
NVIDIAJensen HuangToyotaJapanAMDAIAnd NickNick TurnerNVDAGC=F
– Companies are exploring alternative chip sourcing due to high demand.
– NVIDIA's partnership with Toyota emphasizes robotics integration.
– Japan's aging population drives demand for robotic solutions.
– Increased urgency for AI accelerators may lead to market shifts.
AI technologyrobotics integrationchip supply chain
▸ Full transcript
In terms of they want access to these chips, they want the fastest chips they can get. They certainly, NVIDIA remains the gold standard on that front. Those companies also are trying to find sourcing elsewhere, whether it's sort of making in-house chips or relying on AMD or some of the other companies. So certainly any delays might play out in the sense of increasing the urgency to find alternative sources of AI accelerators. But we're still in a mode now where people want as much NVIDIA chips as they can get. And Nick, when it comes to Jensen Huang being here in Japan, this is a country of course that very much focuses on engineering, also advanced robotics. How do robots fit into NVIDIA's strategy? Yeah, I mean, NVIDIA has been talking up robots, well, for years, but they've really started to kind of intensify that discussion this year. They're working on a lot of both chips and hardware and software that can make robots safer and more practical. And you saw an announcement today with Toyota where they're really working together on a number of things, but certainly robots are going to play into that partnership. And in Japan, robots are about as important as they are, maybe anywhere in the world, given their use of manufacturing and the aging population and the need for potentially robotic help on that front. So it's an important place to be making those announcements. Yeah, we'll be following Jensen Huang's trip here in Japan. Nick Turner, senior tech editor.
Analysis

NVIDIA's dominance in chip technology remains unchallenged, with companies scrambling for access to its AI accelerators. The partnership with Toyota highlights NVIDIA's strategic push into robotics, a sector critical for Japan's manufacturing and aging population needs.

Investors should note the urgency among companies to secure NVIDIA chips, which may drive alternative sourcing strategies. The collaboration with Toyota could signal a broader trend of integrating AI with robotics, potentially reshaping manufacturing dynamics in Japan and beyond.

16:39
PDT
NVIDIA's AI accelerator systems are on track for delivery.
NVIDIAJensen HuangTSMCASMLJapanAINick TurnerVera RubinNVDA
– Market reaction is cautious ahead of production ramp-up.
– TSMC may increase capital expenditures beyond previous guidance.
– Strong demand in the semiconductor sector is evident.
– Investors are closely monitoring production smoothness.
AI technologysemiconductor sectorproduction risk
▸ Full transcript
Push back against any increase in prices by ASML. We also have heard from NVIDIA founder Jensen Huang saying that his company's next generation AI accelerator systems are in production and on track for delivery to customers. He was responding to reports that manufacturing snags made the late rollout. Huang spoke during a visit to Japan to discuss how NVIDIA might aid the country's sovereign and physical AI ambitions. For more, let's bring in senior tech editor Nick Turner. Nick, we saw the market reaction with the tech sell-off when we got the semi-analysis report earlier this month. How much is at stake when it comes to the Vera Rubin? Yeah, well, this is obviously their flagship product. This is the latest generation, supposed to start being delivered essentially this quarter and ramping up production in the fourth quarter. So everybody's really in kind of this wait-and-see mode to see whether production goes as smoothly.
Analysis

NVIDIA's founder Jensen Huang confirmed that the company's next-generation AI accelerator systems are in production and on track for delivery, despite earlier concerns about manufacturing delays. The market is currently in a wait-and-see mode regarding the production ramp-up of this flagship product, which is crucial for NVIDIA's growth.

Smart money should note that the anticipated production smoothness of NVIDIA's AI systems is critical, as any hiccups could impact investor sentiment and stock performance. Additionally, the potential for increased capital expenditures from TSMC, driven by strong demand, could signal a bullish outlook for the semiconductor sector, particularly in AI technologies.

16:36
PDT
TSMC's capital expenditure could exceed previous guidance.
TSMCASMLUBSNVIDIABank of KoreaFIFA World Cup 2026IranU.S.South KoreaPresident of South KoreaAIUnited States
– Sales figures show significant growth, particularly in June.
– Margin pressures may arise from increased production costs.
– ASML's outlook is cautiously optimistic but met with tepid market response.
– The AI sector's growth is influencing semiconductor demand.
semiconductor demandcapital expenditureAI growthmargin pressures
▸ Full transcript
110 and the senior management of ASML saying they're going to have to significantly look at that, investigate that if the demand is holding up. So these two numbers, what we got overnight from ASML, which were good signs, but a bit of a tepid response on the markets and then TSMC perhaps is the big one. Yeah, tepid is right. The bar is pretty high even as we see this sort of extraordinary AI build-out. So given the outlook though for ASML, could we actually see TSMC increase spending beyond even previous guidance? Yeah, well that previous guidance was for near record outlays this year of $56 billion, but UBS for one is saying, you know, given the demand out there right now, there could be a number released upwards of $60 billion. So that is something that we're going to be looking quite closely at. Also, of course, we got those storm-delayed sales figures for the second quarter on Monday which saw a 36% rise in sales at TSMC including a 68% jump in June alone. So that's a good harbinger for the revenue side. We'll have to see though if margins are being squeezed as they ramp up production of 2 nanometer technology and their expansions overseas, most specifically in the United States. To other than CapEx, what else are you looking at?
Analysis

TSMC is expected to potentially increase its capital expenditure guidance from $56 billion to upwards of $60 billion due to strong demand, as indicated by a 36% rise in sales and a 68% jump in June alone. However, there are concerns about margin pressures as TSMC ramps up production of advanced 2 nanometer technology and expands operations in the U.S.

16:34
PDT
South Korea's market is experiencing volatility ahead of the Bank of Korea's decision.
Bank of KoreaTSMCASMLSouth KoreaNVIDIAAIBOKEUVThe NikkeiSouth KoreanNorth AsiaStephen EngelNVDA
– Earnings from TSMC and ASML are highly anticipated for insights on capital expenditures.
– Concerns about a spending bubble in the chip sector are prevalent among investors.
– Government regulation discussions on leveraged funds could impact market dynamics.
– Investor sentiment is closely tied to monetary policy and tech sector performance.
monetary policytech sector volatilitycapital expenditure outlook
▸ Full transcript
When it comes to broader equities, it's also the tech and the AI story as well, right? The Nikkei 225, this is the picture as we head into what is likely to be a pretty choppy day of trade, particularly when it comes to Korea. We have not just the Bank of Korea decision; that's kind of a little bit more cut and dried when it comes to what we're expecting from the BOK. But really beyond monetary policy, we are watching to see what kind of impact the broader volatility for these equity markets has. We've had the South Korean president commenting on that volatility and expectations that more conversations at the high end of government regulation are going to take place on these leveraged funds. Markets are very closely watching for earnings from two of NVIDIA's key suppliers. TSMC is set to report later on Thursday. Our chief North Asia correspondent, Stephen Engel, joins us now from Taipei. So, TSMC's numbers, what are we looking out for? Well, what we're really looking out for is the capital expenditure outlook for this year and into next for TSMC, and of course ASML, which makes the big lithography equipment, the EUV, the extreme ultraviolet lithography machines. So they were out; they gave some good guidance for the industry, and really I think the tech industry and investors, nervous ones, especially in the chip sector, are looking at these two companies for projected outlays for spending amid, of course, what some would say is a bit of a bubble in that kind of spending. But all indications are right now that maybe the.
Analysis

The tech sector is under scrutiny as South Korea's market faces volatility, particularly with the Bank of Korea's upcoming decision and its implications for leveraged funds. Investors are keenly awaiting earnings reports from TSMC and ASML, focusing on capital expenditure outlooks amid concerns of a spending bubble in the chip industry.

Smart money should note that while TSMC and ASML are expected to provide guidance that may alleviate some investor anxiety, the broader implications of government regulation on leveraged funds could create additional market turbulence. The interplay between monetary policy and tech sector performance will be critical in shaping investor sentiment moving forward.

16:32
PDT
U.S. CPI and PPI show positive inflation sentiment.
IranU.S.CPIPPIgasolineStrait of HormuzPresident TrumpBloombergDerek WohlbackBloomberg Equity IndicesCL=FPRIVATE
– Gasoline prices fell 12%, impacting overall inflation metrics.
– Ongoing U.S.-Iran tensions create uncertainty in energy markets.
– Energy security remains a critical concern for investors.
– Geopolitical risks could lead to future oil price volatility.
inflation trendsenergy securitygeopolitical risks
▸ Full transcript
Billion daily data points, and backed by research from hundreds of global experts. Delivering benchmarks driven by the markets, not opinions. Bloomberg Equity Indices, get evolved benchmarks for today's equity markets. And we're setting up for the market opens across Asia and Haiti. We're watching, of course, what's happening around the inflation picture in the U.S. as well, given that we had some potentially more positive sentiment around those inflation numbers, whether it was CPI yesterday where we actually saw the first decline since 2020 or PPI just last night, also surprising lower. But the thing is that energy did most of the work here. Gasoline fell about 12%, pulling down the headline price and transportation costs when it comes to PPI, the latest from June. So we're watching what happens to oil prices, given of course the ongoing tensions between Iran and the U.S. and the fact remains highly that we don't know where this is headed, right? I mean, we are hearing more positive upbeat sentiment coming from the president that Iran has released a U.S. citizen, but at the same time, not necessarily any progress on the negotiations themselves. Exactly. We don't know. That really underscores the conundrum that investors, that economists are just about everyone, really, in at the moment in terms of trying to model expectations for inflation, expectations for energy security.
Analysis

U.S. inflation sentiment improved with recent CPI and PPI data showing declines, primarily driven by a 12% drop in gasoline prices. However, ongoing tensions between Iran and the U.S. create uncertainty in energy markets, complicating inflation expectations and energy security assessments.

Smart money should note that while the decline in energy prices may provide temporary relief, the geopolitical risks surrounding the Strait of Hormuz and U.S.-Iran relations could lead to volatility in oil prices. Investors must remain vigilant as the situation evolves, particularly with the potential for further developments in negotiations or military actions.

16:27
PDT
Strait of Hormuz remains a key pressure point for global energy supply.
Strait of HormuzU.S.IranIsraelNetanyahuDemocratic Party
– Market sentiment is fluctuating between optimism and caution regarding geopolitical tensions.
– Infrastructure investments may not yield short-term benefits for energy supply.
– Upcoming U.S. midterm elections could influence foreign policy and market dynamics.
– Congressional votes on Israel funding are causing divisions within the Democratic Party.
geopolitical riskenergy supplyU.S. foreign policymidterm elections
▸ Full transcript
Watch the tonalities here, right? You know, we have shifted from bellicosity to talks about talks, and we keep going back and forth on there. And yes, it can seem dizzying at times. You do see market gyrations and a certain inoculation to going back and forth all the time. But you really have to watch the sentiment on this in absence of something more tangible. The sentiment on this is, I say in the last hour, there's a little bit of a window of an opening. What happens with that is too early to say. But is that a window of an opening that can potentially be used to de-escalate? Who knows, maybe. I think it's very interesting, the comments from the prior guests talking about how the Strait of Hormuz is so key to this, not just in the short term, but in the medium term to all sorts of things we're seeing in the economy, rightfully pointing out that even if you're talking about infrastructure investments that are going on to try and dodge or get around in the long term, that's not going to do anything in the short term. This is going to be a pressure point in the immediate future until things ease. The president has a lot on his mind lately, right? We're just about four months away from the midterms in Congress. Pretty interesting vote on Israel funding that's seeming to split the Democratic Party. We're also expecting Netanyahu to visit the U.S. over the weekend as well. Yeah, Heidi, really interesting vote in Congress today.
Analysis

Market sentiment is shifting as discussions around the Strait of Hormuz highlight its critical role in the global economy. The potential for de-escalation in tensions could influence energy prices and supply strategies moving forward.

Smart money should note that while infrastructure investments are being made to mitigate risks, these will not provide immediate relief. The ongoing geopolitical tensions and their impact on oil supply chains remain a significant pressure point for the market.

16:25
PDT
Oil demand is currently healthy despite geopolitical tensions.
IranU.S.TrumpDr. Fatih BirolIEAChinaSaudi ArabiaEmiratesBangladeshPakistanIndiaDerek WohlbackCL=FPRIVATEUSDCNH
– Electric vehicle adoption in Asia may impact future oil demand growth.
– Iran's Revolutionary Guard Corps is committed to keeping the Strait of Hormuz closed until U.S. actions cease.
– Countries are reassessing energy strategies in light of current conflicts.
– The situation in the Middle East is causing nervousness in global markets.
geopolitical riskenergy transitionoil market dynamics
▸ Full transcript
It's a normal year to have a judgment. There are many disruptions because of what's happening in the Strait of Hormuz and the prices. But when I look at globally, oil demand is still healthy. In many parts of the world, electric cars are coming. Electrification of the transportation sector is coming, especially in Asia. Not only China, but Southeast Asia. This may have an impact on the global oil demand growth patterns. Great to speak with you. Thank you very much. That's Dr. Fatih Birol, the IEA, joining me here in Aspen at the Aspen Security Forum. Sherry, I'll send it back to you. Thank you so much, David. David Gura there with the latest on the global energy markets, of course, and we'll have plenty more coming up from the Aspen Security Forum in Colorado as well. In the meantime, you're also watching, of course, the ongoing conflict between Iran and the U.S. We talked a little bit about the implications for the energy markets, but the U.S. Central Command now confirming that it launched a second wave of attacks on Iran on Wednesday. Iran's Revolutionary Guard Corps has vowed to keep the Strait of Hormuz closed until the U.S. ends strikes and its naval blockade. Let's bring in Bloomberg's senior editor Derek Wohlback. And Derek, we're still seeing perhaps a little bit of progress with President Trump now saying that Iran has released a U.S. citizen as well. Where are we in these negotiations? Well, we were at a fifth consecutive day of American attention.
Analysis

Oil demand remains healthy globally, but the rise of electric vehicles, particularly in Asia, may alter growth patterns in the oil market. The ongoing conflict between the U.S. and Iran continues to create uncertainty, with Iran's Revolutionary Guard Corps vowing to keep the Strait of Hormuz closed until U.S. strikes cease.

Smart money should note that while the immediate oil demand appears stable, the shift towards electrification in transportation could signal a longer-term decline in oil dependency, particularly in Asia. Additionally, the geopolitical tensions are prompting countries to reassess their energy strategies, which could lead to significant shifts in global supply chains and energy security measures.

16:23
PDT
UAE and Saudi Arabia expanding pipelines to reduce reliance on Strait of Hormuz.
UAESaudi ArabiaIraqKuwaitBangladeshPakistanIndiaAsiaCL=F
– Current pipeline expansions will only cover 50% of the supply risk.
– Asia is highly vulnerable, relying heavily on gas from the Strait.
– Countries are reassessing energy strategies in light of ongoing tensions.
– New energy projects in Iraq and Kuwait may take time to materialize.
geopolitical riskenergy supplymarket volatility
▸ Full transcript
The UAE is expanding their pipeline and Saudi Arabia is expanding their pipelines to east-west pipelines. Even if they are finished on time, they will only be compensating for 50 percent of the Strait of Hormuz. There are many other countries that need to send oil to the Strait of Hormuz at the moment. Therefore, we will be vulnerable to this issue for some time. Of course, there are many new projects; Iraq is one, the Gainsadi, the Emirates, and Kuwait have different projects. But if it takes some time to be realized, consuming countries are also looking at other options in terms of technologies, fuels, and trade routes. How tight is the market right now when it comes to oil and refined products? As you look at this kind of on a regional basis, which regions do you think face the biggest risk of a squeeze right now? Number one, number two, and number three is Asia. Before the crisis started in the Strait of Hormuz, 80 to 90 percent of the gas in Asia came from the Strait of Hormuz. They are very vulnerable, especially Japan and Korea, but mainly developing Asian countries such as Bangladesh, Pakistan, and India.
Analysis

The expansion of pipeline infrastructure by the UAE and Saudi Arabia aims to mitigate vulnerabilities in oil supply through the Strait of Hormuz, yet it will only compensate for 50% of the current risks. Asia remains particularly exposed, with 80-90% of its gas supply historically sourced from this critical route, highlighting the urgent need for alternative energy strategies among consuming nations.

Smart money should note that while new projects are underway, the timeline for their realization is uncertain, leaving markets susceptible to further disruptions. The focus on diversifying energy sources and trade routes indicates a shift in strategy that could reshape regional energy dynamics and investment opportunities.

16:20
PDT
Ongoing Middle East conflict impacts oil supply and pricing.
IranUSBrazilSaudi ArabiaEmiratesIEARussiaUkraineChinaWestern SiberiaCL=F
– Countries are increasing production but face sustainability issues.
– Energy strategies are being reassessed globally.
– Lessons from past energy shocks are influencing current strategies.
– Potential for serious global economic difficulties if conflicts persist.
geopolitical riskenergy supplyinflationary pressures
▸ Full transcript
We are using that oil. Plus, as I just mentioned, we released a huge amount of stocks, oil stocks to the market. Historically, this is also good. Then, the US and Brazil increased production. At the same time, Saudi Arabia and the Emirates made this de-routing, re-routing of the oil. But none of them are endless. So, if the situation continues like this for a very long time, we may have serious difficulties in the global economy. Have we seen countries beginning to replenish those supplies? Aside from that, look at the price of oil. Is that perhaps impacted by them doing that? Or is there still a level of caution where they're not yet doing that? Some countries are doing it, but not everybody. What countries are doing is reviewing their energy strategies. They are drawing lessons from this and they understand that this is a dangerous world. We are in how they can have strategies better prepared for the next energy shock we may face. Let's remember that only four years ago, we had another energy shock after Russia invaded Ukraine. When you look at the map, four years ago, there were two main arteries bringing energy to the world. One of them is from Russia, from Western Siberia to Europe with pipelines.
Analysis

The ongoing conflict in the Middle East is causing significant uncertainty in the oil markets, with countries like the US and Brazil increasing production while Saudi Arabia and the UAE are rerouting oil supplies. However, these measures may not be sustainable, and if the situation persists, serious difficulties could arise in the global economy.

Countries are beginning to reassess their energy strategies in light of recent events, recognizing the need for better preparedness against future energy shocks. This shift in strategy could lead to long-term changes in energy supply dynamics and pricing, particularly as nations draw lessons from past crises like the one following Russia's invasion of Ukraine.

16:17
PDT
Traders are defensive amid geopolitical tensions.
IranU.S.IEAChinaBloombergMark CranfieldKevin WalshAnna CurranDr. Fatih BirolCL=F
– Inflation concerns are heightened due to the Iran conflict.
– AI investments are causing short-term price pressures.
– IEA's historic oil reserve release has temporarily lowered prices.
– Countries are reevaluating energy strategies for potential disruptions.
geopolitical riskenergy strategyinflation pressuresAI impact
▸ Full transcript
The global economy may well hit some difficulties. I hear you use the word hope and I wonder how optimistic you are. Indeed, how worried you are about where we are now over the last 24 hours? I am always worried. In fact, I have always thought at the IEA, always thought what could happen if one day the Strait of Hormuz is closed. You've thought through this many times. Many times we made some exercises and so on. And it is one of the reasons that we released a huge amount of stocks to the markets in a seamless way, which brought the oil prices down by $20. And now the problem is once it is closed, many people think it may be closed again. So countries are not thinking only about what kind of measures they can take today, but how they are going to develop their energy strategies for tomorrow. My understanding is the IEA has about 25% left of those reserves to release. What's the latest thinking on when you might have to deploy those again, if this were to drag on? Yeah. So when we released our stocks, first of all, it was historic, 400 million barrels, which is equivalent to today, almost 2.5 million barrels flowing to the markets daily, providing comfort in the markets. And this was historic because never before have we released so much stock. It was a unanimous decision by all of our member governments. And this was only 20 percent.
Analysis

Traders are cautious about pushing yields down further due to ongoing geopolitical tensions, particularly the Iran conflict, which is likely to keep inflation elevated. The volatility in the tech sector, driven by AI-related investments, adds complexity to the inflation narrative, with short-term price pressures expected despite longer-term job displacement concerns.

The recent release of strategic oil reserves by the IEA has temporarily eased oil prices, but uncertainty remains regarding future supply disruptions. Countries are proactively adjusting their energy strategies in anticipation of potential closures in critical shipping routes, indicating a shift towards more resilient energy policies.

16:15
PDT
U.S. strikes against Iran continue amid rising tensions.
IranUnited StatesChinaDavid Gerrard JohnsonDr. Fatih BirolIEAAspen security forumTVMiddle EastFatih BirolPRIVATEUSDCNH
– Countries are drawing from emergency supplies to manage risks.
– Market uncertainty is prevalent regarding a lasting resolution.
– Energy security remains a critical focus for many nations.
– Short-term volatility in energy prices is likely.
geopolitical riskenergy security
▸ Full transcript
They want to settle so badly. They don't like what we're doing and they do want to settle. We'll find out whether or not we settle with them or we just finish it off. Trump is reiterating claims that Iran is seeking more talks even as the U.S. says strikes will continue until Tehran stops attacking ships in the Strait of Hormuz. While the world absorbs the shocks of conflict in the Middle East, energy security remains a key focus of the Aspen security forum. Bloomberg TV's David Gerrard Johnson is live now from Colorado with our next guest. Yes, Dr. Fatih Birol is with me here in Aspen. Great to have you with us here at the IEA. Let me start by just getting your sense of what's happening in and around the Strait of Hormuz. We've been watching the U.S. strikes, of course. We've seen the ceasefire dissolve and the memo of understanding thrown out. What have you observed over the last 24 hours of what's happening in the region? Big uncertainty. And the markets are nervous whether or not there will be a soon and lasting solution to the problem, and at the same time, many countries are taking some measures to avoid the worst-case scenario. Talk about those measures. What are they doing exactly? We've seen them drawing from supplies obviously on an emergency basis over the course of this. I mean, there are a few things. First, we see that some countries are using their inventories, their stocks such as China and some other countries.
Analysis

The ongoing conflict in the Strait of Hormuz is causing significant uncertainty in energy markets, with the U.S. continuing strikes against Iran until it ceases attacks on shipping. Countries are taking emergency measures, such as drawing from their inventories, to mitigate potential supply disruptions.

Smart money should note that while immediate tensions are high, the long-term implications of these actions could lead to volatility in energy prices and shifts in global supply chains. The focus on energy security amidst geopolitical tensions may prompt countries to reassess their strategic reserves and energy policies.

16:10
PDT
Renewed Iran conflict raises oil price concerns.
IranFederal ReserveChairman WarshBloombergAnna CurranMark CranfieldU.S.AIRAMCL=FFEDFUNDSPRIVATE
– Inflation pressures remain from AI and tariffs.
– Fed's ability to manage inflation is under scrutiny.
– Market sentiment is shifting towards inflation rather than growth.
– Political pressures may influence Fed's decisions.
geopolitical riskinflation dynamicsFed policy
▸ Full transcript
It's kind of a confusing story right now. It's whiplash. When that Iran peace deal was signed a few weeks ago, the story looked like one of relief in the months ahead with the energy story coming off the boil, allowing policymakers to drill into what's going on with the AI inflation story; tariffs are going to be coming off the boil as well in terms of their impact. So the inflationary story looked like it could be easing heading into the sort of back end of the year. But now, of course, we're right back to where we started. The conflict is raging again with Iran, and that's going to have consequences on oil. We know what's going on with diesel costs at the moment. That's going to have some flow-through. The AI story has not gone away, even though, as Mark said, Chairman Warsh is saying it might be near term, we can look through that, but it's happening and it's real on the ground for anyone trying to buy RAM or memory or a laptop. And the tariff story hasn't gone away. It's still an issue and a talking point among companies. They still say that their costs are high as a result of the tariff impact. So the story in the U.S. at the moment is not one of concern about growth per se, not one of concern about the labor market. It's about inflation. It's about how much will it accelerate from here into the year-end. Can the Fed keep a grip on it? Can they not get it back to its target, but at least stop it accelerating from where it is? And that's very much an open question. That's going to be a big test for Chairman Warsh heading into the second half of the year, given the political pressure that he's under.
Analysis

The renewed conflict with Iran is reigniting concerns over oil prices, complicating the inflation outlook as the Federal Reserve prepares for potential interest rate decisions. Despite recent easing signals, the persistent impact of tariffs and AI-related costs continues to challenge policymakers in managing inflation effectively.

Smart money should note that while the Fed may appear to have room to maneuver, the geopolitical tensions and ongoing inflationary pressures from AI and tariffs could force a more aggressive stance than currently anticipated. The market's focus on inflation dynamics rather than growth signals a critical juncture for the Fed's policy direction in the latter half of the year.

16:08
PDT
Traders expect inflation to remain elevated due to geopolitical tensions.
IranFederal ReserveKevin WarshBloombergAIUSFed ChairmanKevin WalshFEDFUNDSPRIVATE
– Fed Chairman Warsh downplays AI-related price hikes as broadly inflationary.
– Tech sector volatility is linked to significant investments in AI infrastructure.
– Job displacement from AI poses a long-term risk to the economy.
– Investors are focused on short-term outcomes rather than long-term trends.
geopolitical riskinflation dynamicsAI impact on economy
▸ Full transcript
At the same level. But looking ahead, traders aren't going to really push yields down very far. When they can see what's happening in the real world, they can see that the Iran conflict is going on. There's plenty for them to see that the chances are that base inflation will stay relatively higher. People are likely to be defensive in terms of bonds and currencies at least. Mark, when he came to the Fed Chairman in the war, she was interesting also that he doesn't necessarily see these one-time price hikes around artificial intelligence as inflationary. And yet when it comes to the tech sector itself, really the volatility has been immense. Yeah, I think it's being a little bit disingenuous there, because clearly the build-up of data centers, the huge amounts of money that hyperscalers are spending right now on the build-up of capacity to be able to produce AI products is clearly inflationary in the short term. There's so many reports about it. Bloomberg have written extensively, investors can see that. They know it's pushing up prices in the near term. Further down the road, job destruction because of AI is a much more serious problem for the US economy and global economy. Jobs will be lost because AI can replace. That's a medium to long-term picture. And that's probably why Kevin Walsh is trying to trade carefully between the now and the later scenarios. As far as investors are concerned, they're more interested in what happens over the next couple of months rather than further down.
Analysis

Traders are cautious as the ongoing Iran conflict suggests that base inflation may remain elevated, impacting bond and currency markets. Fed Chairman Warsh's comments indicate a nuanced view on AI-related price hikes, suggesting that while they may not be broadly inflationary, the tech sector is experiencing significant volatility driven by AI investments.

Smart money should note that while short-term inflationary pressures from AI investments are evident, the long-term implications of job displacement due to AI could reshape economic dynamics. This duality presents both risks and opportunities for investors, particularly in tech and labor-sensitive sectors.

16:05
PDT
Producer prices are declining, easing Fed rate hike pressure.
Federal ReserveFed Chairman WarshIranWTIAIFEDFUNDS
– AI boom acknowledged but not seen as a driver of persistent inflation.
– Traders still expect at least one rate increase in the near term.
– Geopolitical tensions may impact inflation and market stability.
– Upcoming inflation data in September and October will be critical.
Fed policyinflation outlookgeopolitical risks
▸ Full transcript
Transportation and airline fuel costs and all the rest of it. But also, it was somewhat more broad-based food costs coming down. So that's your upstream producer prices that feed into the Fed's preferred inflation gauge, suggesting that with consumer data and inflation data we had this week, net producer prices do take pressure off the Fed. Certainly, it takes pressure off them for the July meeting. We had Fed Chairman Warsh speaking again today. He interestingly made the point that yes, the AI boom is real and yes, willing near term having an impact on prices. But he said that doesn't necessarily equate to broad-based or persistent inflation, hinting there perhaps at a willingness to look through what's happening with the AI boom here. So all taken together, the numbers this week do not add up to the Fed moving in July. I think things will get a lot more complicated though in September and October when we start to get a new round of inflation data, and that would be critically heading into the year-end. Mark, very dangerous for markets to kind of fixate on this idea of again transitory energy inflation, particularly at a time when we're seeing a re-escalation of the war with Iran. What's the pricing looking like at the moment in terms of expectations? We haven't really changed a great deal. Traders are still skewed towards the idea that the Federal Reserve will raise interest rates at least once in the next few months and that's not too surprising. It's not just about the fact that WTI is...
Analysis

Recent producer price data indicates a decline in food costs and transportation expenses, alleviating pressure on the Federal Reserve for a rate hike in July. Fed Chairman Warsh acknowledged the AI boom's impact on prices but suggested it may not lead to persistent inflation, hinting at a more cautious approach to monetary policy moving forward.

Smart money should note that while traders expect at least one rate increase in the coming months, the Fed's stance may shift as new inflation data emerges in September and October. The geopolitical tensions, particularly the re-escalation of the war with Iran, could complicate the inflation outlook and market dynamics significantly.

16:03
PDT
South Korean markets are experiencing significant volatility.
South KoreaBank of KoreaNikkeiBrent CrudeIranU.S.Asset BlumbergSouth KoreanPresident TrumpCL=F
– The Bank of Korea is expected to maintain a policy rate of 2.75%.
– Nikkei futures are slightly up, while South Korean futures are down 4.5%.
– Geopolitical tensions in the Strait of Hormuz are affecting oil market dynamics.
– Iran's release of a U.S. citizen may signal potential diplomatic shifts.
market volatilitygeopolitical tensionscentral bank policy
▸ Full transcript
When it comes to that rate, to the policy rate, all 25 economists surveyed by Asset Blumberg expect that 2.75% rate by the end of Thursday. So we're watching that, but there are also, of course, increasing concerns regarding the wild swings of volatility in the Korean markets. Even the president of South Korea has come out and said that the stock market is quite unstable. We are hearing some reports that there are gatherings and discussions taking place among various government entities, as well as regulators, on the issue of these leveraged ETFs. So we are watching that very closely. In the meantime though, a pretty choppy start is the picture as we look at a mixed open there. This is the last trade when it comes to Chicago. Nikkei futures are modestly to the upside, while South Korean futures are down by 4.5%. We're also watching the dollar-yen at the 162 level and monitoring the won as well, dependent on what we see out of the Bank of Korea. Take a look at the geopolitical story: the U.S. is launching fresh tracks on Iran, and the peril in the Strait of Hormuz and the complications of oil vessels traversing that area is really continuing to escalate. That interim peace deal signed about a month ago is all but collapsing. We do have perhaps some sign of positivity, as President Trump has stated that Iran has released a U.S. citizen. His praise for that is a goodwill gesture in a true social post about this newly released U.S. citizen. So we'll be watching that very closely as well. Oil at the moment is seeing Brent Crude at three-tenths of a...
Analysis

Concerns are rising over the volatility in the South Korean markets, with the president acknowledging the instability and discussions among government entities regarding leveraged ETFs. Nikkei futures show modest gains while South Korean futures are down 4.5%, indicating a mixed market sentiment ahead of the Bank of Korea's policy rate decision expected at 2.75%.

The geopolitical tensions surrounding Iran and the Strait of Hormuz are escalating, which could impact oil prices and market stability. The recent goodwill gesture from Iran, releasing a U.S. citizen, may influence diplomatic relations and market reactions, particularly in the oil sector.

16:01
PDT
Softer U.S. inflation boosts market sentiment.
Wall StreetBank of KoreaU.S.IranBloombergEd LudlowSan FranciscoBloomberg TechBloomberg TelevisionBloomberg This WeekendWatch Bloomberg Real YieldAsia TrinidadPRIVATEFEDFUNDSCL=F
– Wall Street rises despite chip stock declines.
– Oil price concerns linked to the Iran War.
– Bank of Korea expected to raise rates.
– Divergence in monetary policy may affect currencies.
U.S. inflationmonetary policygeopolitical risk
▸ Full transcript
Benchmarks for today's equity markets. Companies and people that are pushing tech to new frontiers and the politics reshaping global tech markets. I'm Ed Ludlow live in San Francisco and this is Bloomberg Tech. Every weekday only on Bloomberg Television. Welcome to Bloomberg This Weekend. Breaking news today from Wall Street to Washington. Burning the seasons underway. We're going to get some key reports. Everything you need to know before the markets open on Monday. This weekend, bringing a little Bloomberg into your weekend routine. Guys, buckle up! Get your fixed income fix. Watch Bloomberg Real Yield every Thursday at 12 p.m. Eastern. Right here on Bloomberg, context changes everything. This is Asia Trinidad, I'm Sherry Anne in Tokyo. The top stories this time were Asia's set for a choppy start after softer than expected U.S. inflation figures drove Wall Street higher despite a route in chip stocks. Oil price fallout from the Iran War bolstering bets the Fed has room to delay hikes. Meanwhile, the Bank of Korea expected to raise rates today. The key question is how fast, how far...
Analysis

U.S. inflation figures came in softer than expected, driving Wall Street higher despite a downturn in chip stocks. The oil price fallout from the Iran War is strengthening expectations that the Federal Reserve has room to delay interest rate hikes.

The Bank of Korea is anticipated to raise rates today, but the pace remains uncertain. This dynamic suggests a potential divergence in monetary policy approaches between the U.S. and Asia, which could impact currency valuations and capital flows.

15:56
PDT
Maria Sharapova is seen as a role model for athletes in business.
Maria SharapovaUSShark Tank
– Her confidence and independence are key traits that resonate with others.
– The importance of pursuing passions in business is emphasized.
– Sharapova's hands-on approach in meetings showcases her commitment.
– Family influence plays a significant role in shaping business perspectives.
athlete entrepreneurshipbusiness inspiration
▸ Full transcript
Grand slam, you want to win the most. Probably US Open. Yeah. Is there an athlete whose business career has inspired you the most? Who hasn't? I would say Maria Sharapova is very interesting. Like she was an insane competitor, like fierce on the court, loved fashion, loved business. Like I thought it was cool how she was able to kind of love all of that and be super successful at all of it. And I think she just has a really cool confidence about her with it. I see her on Shark Tank and I see her doing all these other cool things. You see her on the deal. Yeah, she was on here. I see her doing all these really cool ventures and it's always stuff that she's passionate about and stuff that she likes and just knowing her personality, I think she would be a little bit of an inspiration there. And we've looked at deals together like she's the real deal. She walks the walk. It's not her team. When she shows up in a meeting, it's her by herself. She's very quietly confident, funny too. funny comments like kind of dry and I like relate to that so I like that. He's very aware because she made fun of his shoes. Yeah, I can see that. Go for it. All right, here we go. Best piece of advice you've ever been given and who gave it to? I guess my mom will kind of say if it's like if it's meant to be it's up to me and I think that she was always very independent and she broke all of these barriers in sport but like it was never a thing because it didn't even and like crossed her mind that it was like a roadblock. You know, it was just like you just did it. Her kind of...
Analysis

Maria Sharapova's business acumen and fierce competitiveness on the court serve as an inspiration for athletes looking to transition into business. Her independent approach and ability to break barriers highlight the importance of confidence and passion in pursuing diverse ventures.

15:54
PDT
Qualifying for major tournaments is mentally taxing for athletes.
JPMRoger FedererUS OpenUSAUSStrategic Allocation ActiveVon The HomeHardcore Clay GrassLiegeste TennisFEDFUNDS
– The US Open represents a significant pressure point in a player's career.
– Athletes often face intense scrutiny and expectations during high-stakes matches.
– Mental resilience is crucial for success in competitive sports.
– The connection between sports and family can enhance athlete performance.
athlete mental healthsports performanceinvestment in sports
▸ Full transcript
Anlegen und investiert bleiben. Mit einem aktiven Portfolio. Gekocht vom führenden Anbieter aktiver ETFs in Europa. Risikoprofil wählen und fertig. JPM's Strategic Allocation Active ETFs. Von The Home of Active ETFs. Stuhl, das ist nur das erste, das in deinem Kopf poppt. Dann werden wir uns wieder zurück und forth. Du hast einen zu platt, einer zur Führung der restlichen Lebens, Hardcore Clay Grass. Hardcore. Liegeste Tennis-Player derzeit. Das ist so schwer. Ich denke, Roger Federer. Das ist das meiste Spiel in der Tennis-Karriere. Ich würde sagen, wenn ich die USA auf die erste Zeit gequalifiziert habe, die Qualität auf Islam ist wirklich schwer. Man muss drei Gäste gewinnen, um die Main-Draw zu bekommen. Aber du bist da im Tournament, da spielen, da sind die Leute, alles das. Das ist gut. Ich erinnere mich, dass ich in drei Sätze gewonnen habe. Ich war nicht sehr gut, ob es die Nervs oder die Hege war. Ich weiß nicht, aber ich erinnere mich, dass ich durch das gelt. Das war eine sehr große, mentale Verbrauchung für mich. Weil das ist das Show. Die US Open ist das Show. Ja, ich war junger und ich kam zurück und ich wonte diesen Match. Es war der letzte Rund von Qualifying, um den Main zu kommen. Ich glaube, ich habe die dritte Runde verloren, der letzte Rund von Qualifying, bevor. Es war so wie ein Monkey auf meinem Back, ein sehr menschliches Brick.
Analysis

The discussion highlighted the challenges of qualifying for major tennis tournaments, emphasizing the mental strain athletes face. The speaker reflected on their personal experience at the US Open, illustrating the pressure and significance of performing well in high-stakes environments.

Smart money should note the psychological aspects of competitive sports, as they can impact player performance and marketability. Understanding these dynamics can inform investment strategies in sports-related ventures and athlete endorsements.

15:50
PDT
Player advocacy is crucial for improving tournament standards.
BenWTABilly Jean KingAlanaBank of AmericaFIFA World Cup 2026Bloomberg
– Collaboration among players can enhance revenue generation.
– Maintaining player interest is essential for tournament success.
– The competitive spirit in sports can be channeled into advocacy.
– Family involvement in sports can strengthen community ties.
player advocacysports investmentfamily involvement
▸ Full transcript
I couldn't imagine not having sports in my life. So I definitely think in some aspect, whether it's tennis or hockey or football, I definitely would love to be involved. I have no idea what that entails. I think my dad would definitely like me to be involved, but he knows tennis is the priority right now. So I think he's very cognizant of that. And like he's always like, no, you need to focus on what you need to focus on now. But yeah, it's something I think that I've wanted to do. And I think being an athlete, I mean, I don't know, maybe you can relate, like, I don't know, I'm definitely going to miss that competitive side. And I think I can get to channel some of that through a different way, but I would love to still be involved in sports. It's a pretty good channel, I think. I mean, I've seen you courtside. You get pretty into it. It's spot on, it's spot on. And I don't know how you're competitive, but I do think to Jason's point that there's no better way to get a fix when you're still competitive. You just don't wake up sore, which is nice. You can just watch. And it gets easier when you're not playing, but I think you'll do great. And it's pretty awesome to have that. And it also brings your families together. Like I have two daughters, you have a sister. And my daughter thought I was crazy when we bought these teams. My partner Mark has two daughters as well, and his daughters probably thought the same thing, but now they're all enjoying it. And it brings the family much closer together. I think that is something too that we had when we bought the Sabres specifically. Like we definitely came together a lot more as a family because, you know.
Analysis

The discussion highlights the importance of player involvement in advocating for better standards and investment in tennis events, which could lead to increased revenue and equal prize money. The speaker emphasizes the need for collaboration among players to maintain a competitive spirit and improve the overall landscape of the sport.

A key insight is the recognition that players are the product, and their participation directly influences revenue generation for tournaments. This underscores the necessity for a unified approach among players to ensure their interests are aligned with the growth of the sport, potentially leading to more lucrative opportunities for all stakeholders involved.

15:45
PDT
Players are advocating for higher prize money from Grand Slams.
ATPWTABillie Jean KingJessAlanaBank of AmericaFIFA World Cup 2026NFLNHLSo Jess
– Unity between ATP and WTA players is crucial for successful negotiations.
– Increased player participation can drive higher tournament revenues.
– The role of influential figures like Billie Jean King is pivotal in this movement.
– Managing relationships and adapting to player needs is essential for leadership.
player compensationsports advocacytournament revenue
▸ Full transcript
I think that's what I'm trying to do. I'm trying to be a player advocating for that. I don't know. I gained a lot of respect, I think, from a lot of different players. I'm just, I guess, trying to be somewhat of a voice. And I think it just naturally kind of happened. I don't know if it's my personality a bit. Maybe my parents, obviously, what they've done. Yeah. And just being able to think about things pretty clearly, I think, from both sides. Because you definitely get, you know, one side where they're all pushing what they want. And then you get the player side. So, yeah, it was interesting. I just kind of came into it, but I would say being on that player council kind of started that, where you just, you learn. So Jess, I want to talk about your parents a bit and your family because as we talked about earlier, you know, truly one of the first families of the NFL and the NHL these days, had a great opportunity in 2020, actually here in Miami to interview your mom and you know, just amazing insights into the family business. And we've been talking a lot about partnership and relationships with players. There is something special about Buffalo, your hometown. You were born there. What are the lessons specifically you've taken from them as you've thought about your own business journey? I would say what my mom always says is that it's just managing people. I think it's probably helped me a bit and what I've had to do just as like, sometimes you have to adapt, I think, to people's.
Analysis

Tennis players are increasingly advocating for higher prize money, particularly from Grand Slam events, highlighting the need for unity between ATP and WTA players. The conversation around player compensation is evolving, with a focus on collaboration and setting higher standards for tournaments to attract top talent and increase revenue.

The push for equal prize money reflects a broader trend in sports where athletes are becoming more vocal about their financial rights. This movement could lead to significant changes in how tennis tournaments are structured and funded, impacting both player earnings and tournament profitability.

15:43
PDT
Charleston Open announced equal prize money for WTA and ATP 500 events.
Charleston OpenWTAATPBillie Jean KingBen NavarroWall Street WeekBloomberg This WeekendBloomberg TelevisionPRIVATE
– This move may set a new standard for other tournaments.
– Players are discussing unity to push for higher prize money.
– Billie Jean King is actively supporting the movement for equality.
– Challenges remain in coordinating player efforts across tours.
equal prize moneyplayer advocacytennis business dynamics
▸ Full transcript
Don't miss Bloomberg deals live every week. Good morning. This is Bloomberg surveillance. Welcome back to the opening trade. It's Bloomberg money. This is the Asia trade. This is Wall Street Week. Welcome to Balance of Power. You're watching Bloomberg deals. Welcome to Bloomberg This Weekend. This is Bloomberg Television. Join me each week on Wall Street Week for stories of capitalism from business, markets, economics, tech, and climate. More than what you need to know, it's what you need to think about. You've been very interested and vocal about the business of tennis for a long time. You don't have to be, you know, you could just go out and play. So what is that process like where you make a decision to really advocate and to be a leader, you know, truly like in the lineage of Billy and others who've really advocated not just for themselves, but for other players? It's been interesting. I don't think, you know, when I first got asked to just be on like the WTA player council. Like I only did it because a girl retired and they're like, we need someone to fill the spot and they kind of convinced me. And I was like, I don't know if this is for me.
Analysis

The Charleston Open has set a precedent for equal prize money in tennis, with the tournament owner announcing a match of WTA 500 prize money to that of ATP 500 tournaments. This move is seen as a significant step towards addressing the longstanding disparity in prize money between men's and women's events, potentially influencing other tournaments to follow suit.

The conversation highlights the challenges of unifying players across both ATP and WTA tours to advocate for higher prize money, particularly at Grand Slam events. The involvement of influential figures like Billie Jean King suggests a growing momentum for change, but achieving consensus among players remains a complex task.

15:38
PDT
Ben Navarro's decision to equalize prize money is a pivotal moment for tennis.
Jess PagulaBen NavarroWTAATP
– Players are increasingly recognizing their role in driving tournament revenue.
– Unity among players is crucial for achieving equitable prize money.
– The conversation around prize money is evolving, with more players willing to engage.
– Maintaining momentum in discussions about prize money is challenging.
prize money equityplayer revenuetournament investment
▸ Full transcript
Continue to grow and get better and evolve. And again, I hope that with Ben doing what he did, it kind of sets the standard, because I do think it creates a healthy competition. I'm on a WTA player council, so I see more of the tournament side, and I think setting the standards very high and investing in your event is a really big deal, because that's how you get players to play, that's how you get them to come back, and then hopefully, you know, you're making more money and so on and so on, and you can make that equal prize money because it's a process. And it's an interesting thing. I mean, I think about it from the perspective of the players are the product, you know? So it's like, if the best players aren't showing up, the revenue is not going to be as high for the tournament. I mean, it's just not, because people aren't going to tune in. They're not going to buy tickets. They're not going to spend their money there. I think like it's gotten so much better because one, I think players are starting to see that. I do think our sport, I mean, I don't know, is a little bit more open as far as talking to each other about this stuff. I think sometimes in tennis, in selfish, of course, I don't mean in a bad way, but you're in your own little world. Because you said you're not part of an organization or a team. I run my own team, basically. Who's my team? I control that. It's the same with every other player. So I do feel like that I've been able to talk to a lot of players about it, and they're all for it. It's just kind of getting everyone to be all for it at the same time on the same page, and then also not kind of burning out with it. I think keeping that narrative going constantly is something that's hard.
Analysis

Jess Pagula emphasizes the importance of setting high standards for prize money in tennis, highlighting a recent move by tournament owner Ben Navarro to equalize prize money between WTA and ATP events. This shift could foster healthy competition and attract top players, ultimately increasing revenue for tournaments.

The conversation reveals a growing awareness among players about their value as the product of the sport, suggesting that unified efforts towards equitable prize money could reshape the financial landscape of tennis. The challenge remains in aligning all players to advocate for these changes simultaneously, which could be a significant hurdle.

15:36
PDT
Tennis players unlikely to strike due to income reliance on match winnings.
ATPWTAGrand SlamGrand Slams
– Ongoing discussions among ATP and WTA players about increasing prize money.
– Rare potential for unity between male and female players in tennis.
– Focus on Grand Slam prize money as a key issue.
– Players encouraged to ask for higher revenue sharing.
prize money equityplayer unitytennis revenue dynamics
▸ Full transcript
To that part, it's really hard to get all of us as individual, independent people all on the same page as far as that. And so I don't really know if you'll ever see a strike or just, you know, people agree to not play. There's always been talks of it, but like in tennis, you know, you make your money a lot by winning matches. You don't have a set salary or get paid anything for just the year, you know. So I think that always changes everyone's mind as far as like, I have to keep playing. I'm not going to strike. I'm not going to boycott. I'm not going to do all these things. So I don't know if we'll ever truthfully, like looking now, just knowing how tennis players are and how they have to be. I don't really know if it'll ever quite get there, but I've definitely been in talks with a lot of the debutain ATP players as far as joining together to just try to get a higher prize money revenue, especially from the Grand Slams. I think that's something that can be done. And quite frankly, we've never really had both the men and the women on both sides actually come together, which is super rare in any sport because when would that really ever happen? But because it benefits both of us, it's something that's been a topic, especially this year, as far as just asking for a little bit more. You know, and I think that's something that you have to, you have to ask, you know, you don't know unless you ask. So I think that's just kind of something that we're headed towards. Hopefully it gets higher, but it's definitely a work in progress and I think is going to take a lot of unity between a lot of the top players from the ATP and the WTA side.
Analysis

Tennis players are discussing the challenges of unifying for a strike or boycott due to their income structure, which relies heavily on match winnings rather than a guaranteed salary. There is a growing conversation among ATP and WTA players about collaborating to increase prize money, particularly at Grand Slam events, highlighting a rare moment of potential unity in the sport.

The insight here is that while individual financial incentives may deter collective action, the ongoing dialogue about prize money could signal a shift in player dynamics. If players successfully unite, it could lead to significant changes in revenue distribution, impacting the financial landscape of professional tennis.

15:33
PDT
Charleston Open announced equal prize money for men and women.
Charleston OpenBen NavarroWTAATP
– This sets a new precedent for other tournaments in tennis.
– Prize money discrepancies still exist in non-slam events.
– Ben Navarro's decision could influence future sponsorships.
– Potential for increased investment in women's sports.
gender equality in sportssponsorship trendswomen's sports investment
▸ Full transcript
A tournament win in Charleston for you. Congratulations. Thank you. You played great. What I found so fascinating, Alex, was there's a really interesting business story behind the Charleston Open. Remind us what was going on there with the prize money and everything, because it's a really significant moment, it feels like, in the history of the sport. Definitely. So last year, I won the tournament back-to-back years now. So last year after the finals, they announced that they're going to have equal prize money, which was matching, so it's a WTA 500. We have like 250s, 500s, 1000s, and grand slams. So 500 is usually very strong events, not quite as big as a Tour 1000 event. But everyone kind of has this perception that men and women receive equal prize money. It is at the slams, but it's actually not at a lot of the other events. So there's a big discrepancy there. And so the tournament owner, Ben Navarro, announced that he was going to match basically the WTA 500 prize money along with that of the ATP 500 level tournaments. It's a big difference. And so it was an amazing announcement. I kind of joked like, 'Oh, man, you couldn't have done it this year.' But I guess it paid off because I was able to win the tournament this year. So it was a big step, and I think it set a very high standard for all the other tournaments. Sometimes you need just like that one person to do something to kind of raise that level of commitment. So hopefully we start seeing some of the other tournaments kind of make their way to that. So, Jess, speaking right on that point, and congrats on the win.
Analysis

The Charleston Open has made headlines by announcing equal prize money for men and women, a significant move in the tennis world. This decision sets a new standard for other tournaments, highlighting the ongoing disparities in prize money across different levels of the sport.

Smart money should note that this commitment from the tournament owner, Ben Navarro, could catalyze similar changes across other events, potentially reshaping the financial landscape of women's sports. The move not only enhances the visibility of women's tennis but also signals a growing trend towards equality in sports sponsorship and investment.

15:31
PDT
Geopolitical news is crucial for market movements.
Guy JohnsonAnna EdwardsTom McKenzieAnne-Marie HodernJess PagulaAlex RodriguezJason KellyBloombergTom McMarie HodernThe DealPRIVATEUSDCNH
– Resilience and confidence are key themes in investment strategies.
– Leadership in sports can parallel business innovation.
– Cultural factors may influence market performance.
– Investors should monitor sectors with strong leadership.
geopolitical riskleadership in sportsinvestment resilience
▸ Full transcript
The opening trade brings you everything you need to know as markets open across Europe. I'm Guy Johnson. I'm Anna Edwards. And I'm Tom McKenzie. This is your opening trade, only on Bloomberg. Bringing you up-to-the-minute geopolitical news whenever and wherever it happens. I'm Anne-Marie Hodern in Beijing, China. And this is Bloomberg. My mom would kind of say, if it's like if it's meant to be, it's up to me. I think that she was always very independent and she broke all of these barriers in sport, but it was never a thing because it didn't even cross her mind that it was a roadblock. It was just like you just did it. So I feel like that definitely stemmed with me as far as people say, oh, you're so sure of yourself and confident. I'm like, well, because I guess I don't even see the roadblock. I'm just kind of like, we'll just do it. Welcome back to The Deal. I'm Jason Kelly. And I'm Alex Rodriguez. On today's show, Jess Pagula. Alex, I am so interested to talk to her. She's one of the world's best tennis players right now. She's also a chief architect around the business of tennis. Well, that's what I'm really excited about.
Analysis

The opening trade signals a focus on geopolitical news and market movements across Europe, highlighting the importance of staying informed as markets open. Notably, the discussion around barriers in sports reflects a broader theme of resilience and confidence that can translate into investment strategies.

Smart money should recognize the potential for growth in sectors influenced by strong leadership and innovation, as exemplified by figures like Jess Pagula in tennis. The emphasis on overcoming obstacles suggests that companies fostering a culture of resilience may outperform in challenging market conditions.

Transcript evidence
🦉 News Assistant
Thinking…